What's in store for the Senate? We now have 55 seats, more than enough to insulate us from a RINO or two (cough, Specter, cough). But it's not enough to beat a filibuster--that requires 60 votes.
The filibuster, of course, is a procedural rule (no one actually talks anymore) that Daschle had been using to prevent Bush's Federal Appeals Court nominees from ever getting a confirmation vote in the Senate. It was a desperate tactic never before employed against any appointee to an Appeals Court, but the Dems had no choice and used it time and again. They couldn't win a vote, so they opted for the extreme tactic of preventing any voting at all.
We have always suspected the Democrats figured 2 years ago that their judicial filibusters would cost them a couple of Senate seats, and decided it was a price they were willing to pay. Well, they did pay--4 seats including Daschle himself, the only incumbent Senator to lose last night.
The question is, what will the Democrats do now? They have more vulnerable seats coming up in 2006. Will they abandon the filibuster or will they try to protect those seats?
Any predictions? Nope. We'll just have to wait and see, especially if/when a Supreme Court seat becomes available.